Continental National American Group v. Allied Mutual Insurance
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Justice.
This is a contest between insurance companies to determine which will have to supply insurance coverage in a suit for injuries arising out of an automobile-pedestrian accident. The sole question for decision is the interpretation and applicability of a policy provision commonly known as an “automobile business exclusion.” Continental National brought an action for declaratory judgment to determine which company should supply primary insurance coverage and summary judgment was entered in favor of Continental National. We reverse.
The facts of this matter are uncontroverted. On…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Exchange Casualty & Surety Co. v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Miller v. World Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- Deville v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Thomas v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Hammer v. Malkerson Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Casey v. Highlands InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Mullins v. Federal Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. National Insurance Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Steel Farms, Inc. v. Croft & Reed, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.