Legal Opinion

Hofer v. Federal Cartridge Corporation

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 24, 1947No. 1650PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.

The issue presented is: Are these plaintiffs exempt as professional employees within the meaning of Section 13(a) (1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S. C.A. § 213(a) (1), which provides that the overtime provisions shall not apply to any employee who is employed in a “bona fide * * * professional * * * capacity?” The Administrator has defined a bona fide professional employee as one who is

“(A) Engaged in work—
“(1) Predominantly intellectual and varied in character as opposed to routine mental, manual, mechanical, or physical work, and
“(2) Requiring the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Aulen v. Triumph Explosive, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1944
  3. Principe v. Arturo Lluberas Y SobrinosDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Owsley v. San Antonio Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Powell v. American Red CrossDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  3. Hodgson v. MauldinDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1972
  4. Walling v. LippoldDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API