Legal Opinion

Miers & Rose v. Trevino

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 22, 1919No. 6234PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Bexar County; J. T. Sluder, Judge. Suit by Jose G. Trevino against Miers & Rose, the State National Bank, the Commonwealth Bank & Trust Company, and others. Judgment for' plaintiff, and the named defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCobbs, J.

On the 20th 'day of September, 19Í6, Jose G. Trevino, as plaintiff:, instituted suit against A. O. Dauchy, J. G. Griner, attorney in fact for Jose G. Trevino, A. C. Dauchy, as attorney in fact by substitution for Jose G. Trevino, ,J. H. Kirkpatrick, Walker, Moore & Go., J. Oppen-keimer & Go., Alamo National Bank, State National Bank, Commonwealth Bank & Trust Company, successors to West Texas •Bank & Trust Company, and Miers & Rose, a copartnership composed of George G. Miers and Ered M. Rose, and Harry Landa, for the primary purpose of annulling and canceling an assignment purporting to have…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Gouldy v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  3. Harlowe v. HudginsTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Hunter v. EasthamTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Frost v. Erath Cattle Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  2. Gittings, Neiman-Marcus, Inc. v. EstesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Kuldell v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
  4. Parker v. BoylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API