Legal Opinion
In Re Williams Companies ERISA Litigation
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided July 14, 2003No. 4:02-cv-00153PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOLMES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion of Defendant The Williams Companies, Inc. and Director Defendants Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to Dismiss the Amended Consolidated Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Under ERISA (Docket No. 80), filed January 27, 2003; and Defendant Members of the Investment and Benefits Committees of the Williams Companies’ Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Docket No. 76), filed January 27, 2003. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Dismiss by The Williams Companies, Inc. (“Williams”) and the Board of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re Broadwing, Inc. Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
- In Re Morgan Stanley Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In Re Sprint Corp. ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Rankin v. RotsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Howell v. Motorola, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.