Legal Opinion
Karen L. Ex Rel. Jane L. v. Health Net of the Northeast
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 9, 2003No. CIV.A.3:99 CV 2244 CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
DRONEY, District Judge.
Pending is the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction [Doc. #459]. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants did not comply with federal Medicaid statutes and regulations and the due process requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution when the composition of a preferred drug formulary was changed on October 1, 2002. Specifically, the plaintiffs allege that the notices provided by the defendant Health Net of the Northeast (“Health Net”) regarding the changes to its formulary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bery v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Able v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Richardson v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Buffalo Forge Co. v. Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Coney Island Prep v. United States Department of Health And Human ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Karen L. v. Health Net of the Northeast, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Pilling v. AustinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Pilling v. AustinDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024