Kwasnik v. Leblon
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
*(Caption amended Per Clerk’s Order of 8/28/06).
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant, Marek A. Kwasnik, appeals the order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissing his civil rights complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine. 1
Kwasnik has been a party to both state and federal court proceedings relating to his divorce. See “Certification,” Appellant’s Appdx. Vol. 3, p. 260-261. In 2001, after losing joint custody of his son, Robert, during divorce proceedings, Kwasnik initiated three actions in the United States District Court for the District of Maine against his ex-wife, the New Jersey…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by43 opinions
- Mikhail v. KahnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Schwartz v. Schwartz (Schwartz)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2008
- Nellom v. Delaware County Domestic Relations SectionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- BLACKWELL v. TIERNEYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- BYRD v. FINLEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.