Legal Opinion
BLACKWELL v. TIERNEY
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 3, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01904Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PITTSBURGH ANDREW C. BLACKWELL, ) ) ) 2:21-CV-01904-MJH Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) ANETTE TIERNEY, HEARING OFFICER ) TIERNEY; AND ALLEGHENY COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATION SECTION, FAMILY DIVISION, Defendants, OPINION Plaintiff, Andrew C. Blackwell, pro se, commenced this proceeding by filing a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1) and attaching a Complaint (ECF No. 1-1), against Defendants alleging violations of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Upon review of Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mark D. Tourscher v. Martin Horn, Secretary of the Pa. Dept. Of Corrections John McCullough Superintendent ,(d.c. Civil No. 98-Cv-00176j)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.