Georgia Public Service Commission v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Almand, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Counsel for the defendants in error in their brief say that the questions presented by the demurrer, by the exceptions concerning the evidence, and by the exceptions to the grant of the interlocutory injunction, are as follows: 1. Is this a suit against the State? 2. Did the plaintiff have an adequate remedy at law? 3. Are the orders of December 11 and 22, 1948, unconstitutional? 4. Did the Georgia Public Service Commission have statutory authority to adjust rates as it did in the situation here presented in the orders attacked? Under the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Taffet v. Southern Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Southall v. Stricos CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Opinion of Justices to House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.