Legal Opinion · Dissent

Blondell v. Ahmed

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 2016No. 15-796Published

1DissentBryant, Judge

The majority opinion reverses and remands the trial court's order on summary judgment, determining that there existed a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether Sellers breached their duty of good faith and fair dealing when they "negotiated for the termination of the Listing Agreement." Because I do not see evidence in the record to indicate a *487genuine issue of material fact, i.e., that Sellers violated their duty of good faith and fair dealing, especially where Agent herself represented that she no longer had an agreement with Sellers, I respectfully dissent.

I disagree with the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Will of JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Estate of Loftin v. LoftinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Jaudon v. SwinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API