Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
McVICAR, District Judge.
This action is now before us on the motion of the defendant filed June 20, 1941, for permission to file and serve upon the plaintiff a second supplemental answer and counterclaim, a copy of which is attached to the motion.
In the proposed second supplemental answer and counterclaim it is averred, inter alia, that the plaintiff and the Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corporation, August 30, 1940, entered into an agreement whereby said Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corporation and its subsidiaries were granted an unlimited non-exclusive license and release under patent No. 1,779,195 of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Durant v. Essex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. UNITED STATES ENG. & FOUNDRY CO.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1933
- MacKall v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- Union Nat. Bank of Youngstown v. Superior Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.