Legal Opinion

Kruse v. Voyager Insurance Companies

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1995No. 94-827PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

The issue certified for our review is “whether a creditor’s failure to provide adequate notice of the sale of collateral establishes, as a matter of law, that the sale was commercially unreasonable so as to permit the debtor to not only defeat a prayer for a deficiency judgment but also obtain money damages under R.C. 1309.50(A).”

R.C. 1309.50(A) (UCC 9-507[l]) provides:

“If it is established that the secured party is not proceeding in accordance with the provisions of sections 1309.44 to 1309.50, inclusive, of the Revised Code, disposition may be ordered or restrained on appropriate terms and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davenport v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  2. Liberty National Bank v. GreinerOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Erdmann v. RantsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Staley Employee Credit Union v. ChristieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Gulf Homes, Inc. v. GoubeauxArizona Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re SCHWALBUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2006
  2. Textron Financial Corp. v. Trailiner Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. American Seaway Foods, Inc. v. Belden South Associates Ltd. PartnershipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Kruse v. Voyager Ins. Cos.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Am. Seaway Foods, Inc. v. Belden S. Assoc. L.P.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API