Legal Opinion

State v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 23, 1938PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The defendant offered no evidence, but rested his defense upon the contentions that: (1) He did not commit the crime; (2) the alleged confessions made by him were incompetent, and (3) that his age precluded his being sentenced to death.

To detail the evidence herein to any considerable extent would serve no good purpose. It is sufficient to say that there was ample evidence offered tending to show that the crime of rape was committed upon the person of the prosecutrix and to identify the defendant as the perpetrator of the crime. The prosecutrix testified to facts sufficient to constitute the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . BurnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  2. State v. . HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. State v. . YearganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. State v. . PughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859
  5. State v. . SamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1864

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API