Moore v. Protection Ins.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
Tenney J.
The plaintiffs procured “ three thousand dollars on their stock in trade, consisting of dry goods, kept in a frame store, occupied by themselves in Belfast,” to be insured by the defendants, for the term of one year, by a policy dated Dec. 15, 1845. Conditions are annexed to the policy, which by its terms constitute a part of it. By the tenth condition, it is necessary after a loss by fire, that the assured should forth*98with give notice thereof to the company, and as soon as possible deliver in a particular account of such loss or damage, signed with their own hands, and verified by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- New-York Equitable Insurance v. LangdonNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Higgins v. PackardThe Superior Court of New York City · 1829
3Cited by16 opinions
- Aetna Insurance v. KleinTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Aetna Insurance Co. v. KleinTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Warren v. Waterville Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- Goldthwaite v. Sheraton RestaurantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
- Campbell v. Great Lakes Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.