Legal Opinion

D'ANGIO v. Borough of Nescopeck

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 6, 1999No. 4:CV-98-1115PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

McCLURE, District Judge.

BACKGROUND:

On June 10, 1998, plaintiff Decio D’An-gio commenced this action with the filing of a complaint alleging that the Public Indecency Ordinance (“the ordinance” or “Nescopeck ordinance”) enacted by Nescopeck on May 11, 1998, violates (1) his freedom of speech under the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions and (2) his rights under the Equal Protection provisions of both constitutions. By order dated January 29, 1999, this court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). This court declined to exercise supplemental…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. York International Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Donegan v. LivingstonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. In re Scotto-DiClementeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
  5. Infirst Bank v. Jager (In re Jager)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API