Legal Opinion
City of Lynchburg v. Smith
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided June 11, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrowning, J.
The opinion by the' Honorable Edward Meeks, judge of the Circuit Court of Amherst county, is justified by the record and sufficiently supports the decree complained of, which, therefore, will be affirmed.
“This suit was brough by the City of Lynchburg against E. L. Smith, et als., to secure an injunction and establish certain alleged rights under easements by grants pertaining to rights-of-way in connection with its water system, in, over and across the county of Amherst.
“In the years 1904 to 1906, the city of Lynchburg, acting under and because of its municipal powers created by statute and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Winslow v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Tong v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Allen v. San José Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Hammond v. HammondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Buckles v. Kennedy Coal CorporationSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. an Easement & Right of Way 150 Feet Wide & 582.4 Feet Long Over Certain Land in De Kalb CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1960
- Hamilton v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1959
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. WebbSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- Williams v. Northern Natural Gas CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1955
- Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. OttDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.