Legal Opinion

In Re Emeritus Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided August 24, 2005No. 04-05-00171-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CATHERINE STONE, Justice.

This case of first impression raises issues of whether and to what extent a judgment creditor can engage in post-judgment discovery after the judgment debtor has superceded the judgment by posting a cash deposit. Specifically, we must consider the interplay between Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 621a and Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24. Emeritus Corporation contends the trial court clearly failed to correctly analyze or apply Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 621a when it denied Emeritus’s motion to quash post-judgment discovery and for a protective order.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Mitchell Energy Corp. v. AshworthTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Black v. American Bankers Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Sayre v. MullinsTexas Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Christus Spohn Hospital KlebergTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Emeritus Corp. v. Ofczarzak, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
  3. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. NL IndustriesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  4. Huff Energy Fund, L.P. v. Longview Energy Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  5. Rowland Martin, Jr. v. Edward L. Bravenec and 1216 West Ave., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API