In re Biozoom, Inc. Securities Litigation
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER [Resolving Docs. 102, 103]
JAMES S. GWIN, District Judge.
In this putative securities class action, Plaintiffs generally seek rescission or damages after the value of Biozoom securities that Plaintiffs had purchased collapsed. Plaintiffs purchased the stock in over-the-counter markets from market makers. Plaintiffs contend the Biozoom securities were unregistered and argue that the Defendant market makers are strictly liable for selling the unregistered stock.
Plaintiffs make claims under Section 12(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 and under a variety of state-law theories.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- KRUPSKI v. COSTA CROCIERE S. P. ASupreme Court of the United States · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Caledonian Bank Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Rayfield v. Grand Rapids, City ofDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2018
- Dawn Sommer v. Allied Building Services, LLC and Allied Building Service Company of Detroit, IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Johnson v. Baptist Memorial Health Care CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Stansbury v. FaulknerDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020