Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Kingsley-Agurkis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 15, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 12, 1999, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.
Claimant was seasonally employed as a tax examiner by the Internal Revenue Service since 1992. Claimant filed a claim for unemployment insurance benefits effective September 1995, September 1996 and September 1997, with additional claims *598effective July 1996, July 1997 and November 1997. These periods represented claimant’s seasonal discharge from her employment. Prior to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Claim of EcklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of ArnoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re the Claim of RappaportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re the Claim of VargasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of DrevinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of RostolderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of ForsytheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of LynchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003