Legal Opinion

Maroski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1999PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODGERS, Senior Judge.

Frank MarosM (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that reversed in part, vacated in part and affirmed in part a workers’ compensation judge’s (WCJ) decision denying Bethlehem Steel Corporation’s (Employer) petitions for termination, suspension and review of medicals. We affirm.

On October 30, 1992, Claimant sustained a work-related crush injury to his left hand while working for Employer as a crane operator. He received workers’ compensation benefits pursuant to a notice of compensation payable. In August of 1992,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Hoffmaster v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Senco Products, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Terminato v. Pennsylvania National InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. County of Allegheny v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. County of Allegheny v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Hepler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Scalise Industries v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. County of Allegheny v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API