Legal Opinion
State v. Goetz
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided November 27, 2001No. 01-0954-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.
¶ 1. The State appeals an order suppressing statements made by Susan Goetz during the execution of a search warrant. The State argues that law enforcement did not have to give Goetz her Miranda1 warnings because she was not in custody when she gave her statements. We agree and reverse the order.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2. On January 6, 2000, Oconto County sheriffs deputies executed a search warrant at Goetz's residence. The warrant authorized a search for evidence related to cultivating and processing marijuana.
¶ 3. Goetz was present when the warrant was executed. Upon entering the premises, deputy Dale…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Schneller v. St. Mary's Hospital Medical CenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Matthew A. LonkoskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. QuigleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
- State v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
- State v. SchloegelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- State v. GoetzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.