Legal Opinion
Rahman v. Lee
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 4, 2024No. 1:23-cv-05665Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RASHID RAHMAN, Plaintiff, 23-cv-5665 (LAP) -against- MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CHUNG LEE, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: Before the Court are Defendant’s six motions in limine, (see dkt. no. 43),1 and Plaintiff’s three motions in limine, (see dkt. no. 46). The Court held oral argument on September 3, 2024. The Court’s rulings on each motion are set forth below. I. Legal Standard Evidence must be relevant to be admissible at trial. See Fed. R. Evid. 401-02. “[U]nless an exception applies, all ‘[r]elevant…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Nikitas Amorgianos v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Nimely v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.