Legal Opinion
Michigan State AFL-CIO v. Callaghan
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 31, 2014No. Case No. 13-cv-10557PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (document no. 17)
STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, District Judge.
In December 2012, Michigan enacted Public Act 348 of 2012 (“PA 348”) (codified at Mich. Comp. Laws § 423.1 et seq.). The law describes employees’ labor rights, prescribes certain conditions of employment, and prohibits certain coercive practices. PA 348 also provides civil and criminal remedies to redress violations of the law. After the law’s passage, labor organizations sued state and local officials for a declaration that federal law preempts PA 348 and for an…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- International Union of Operating Engineers Local 370 v. WasdenDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2016
- International Ass'n of Machinists District 10 v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017