Legal Opinion

Ammerman v. Lush

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1975No. Appeal, No. 1448PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Price, J.,

This appeal questions the propriety of the entry of a summary judgment in favor of appellees, Frank D. Lush and Lush Brothers, Inc. The case was instituted by appellant, Calvin L. Ammerman, following a collision between his car and that of appellees. As a result of the accident, appellant suffered severe injuries to his throat, larynx, trachea and esophagus as well as to his head and legs. The injuries have prevented appellant from performing any heavy work, and have created damages in excess of $10,000.

Following the close of the pleadings, appellees moved for summary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Kopar v. MAMONESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Speyer, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Admiral Corp. v. Cerullo Electric Supply Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nash v. Chemetron CorporationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Matson v. Parking Service Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Dauphin Deposit Bank & Trust Co. v. TennySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Suplee v. LeedomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Roberts v. Hazle Yellow Cab Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API