Legal Opinion

Matter of Estate of Krokowsky

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1995No. CV-94-0097-PRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.

This case involves the interpretation of the will of Janya Krokowsky (“decedent”). Decedent’s niece and heir-at-law Merle Feitler challenges the rulings of the trial court and the court of appeals, both of which held, to varying degrees, that the will granted decedent’s longtime Mend, Mary Brown, a general power of appointment which, in turn, could be exercised by Brown’s guardian/conservator. We have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and Ariz.R.CivApp.P. 23. For reasons stated below, we reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On June…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McQuarrie v. KuttlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Newhall v. McGillArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. In Re Lidston's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Estate of BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Henderson v. SnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of JetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re Estate of PouserArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Wetherill v. BashamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. State v. PalmNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Estate of Walter v. WalterColorado Court of Appeals · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API