Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Pouser

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1999No. CV-97-0407-PRPublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

¶ 1 After a trial to the court, the trial judge found that decedent Benjamin Pouser had intended that appellee Suzanne Pouser, Benjamin’s second wife, inherit the maximum amount allowable under the federal estate tax marital deduction in effect at the time of his death and that Suzanne was therefore entitled to Benjamin’s entire estate, to the exclusion of appellants Richard Pouser, Harold Pouser, and Amy Pouser Webb, Benjamin’s children by a previous marriage. 1 The court of appeals reversed the judgment, ruling that the trial court’s findings as to Benjamin’s intent…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Hutcherson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Whittemore v. AmatorArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Bank of California v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Denise R. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Double AA Builders, Ltd. v. Grand State Construction L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. In Re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & SourceArizona Supreme Court · 2000

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API