Legal Opinion

People v. Barr

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 23, 1996No. 96SA425PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel have executed a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. C.R.C.P. 241.18. The parties agreed that the respondent should be suspended from the practice of law for a period in the range of thirty days to three months. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission, with the recommendation that the respondent be suspended for three months. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. GoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. People v. ZeilingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. People v. BarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. CulverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. People v. RiddleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API