Legal Opinion

David Mistachkin v. Dylan Spencer et al.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided July 13, 2026No. 3:25-cv-05902Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 AT TACOMA 6 DAVID MISTACHKIN, Case No. 3:25-cv-05902-TLF 7 Plaintiff, v. ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS 8 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DYLAN SPENCER ET AL, 9 Defendants. 10 11 The Court has considered the briefs, documents submitted with the briefs, the 12 audiovisual evidence, and the balance of the record. For the reasons discussed below, 13 defendant’s motion is granted, and plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment is 14 denied. Qualified immunity applies to all defendants because Mr. Mistachkin’s Fourth 15 Amendment rights were…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API