Legal Opinion
State v. Cerrillo
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 8, 2004No. 20386-7-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
93 P.3d 960 (2004)
122 Wash.App. 341
STATE of Washington, Petitioner,
v.
Gerardo CERRILLO, Respondent.
No. 20386-7-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Two.
July 8, 2004.
John D. Knodell III, Prosecuting Attorney, Carole A. Highland, Teddy E. Chow, Deputy Prosecuting Attorneys, Ephrata, WA, for Appellant.
Garth L. Dano, Garth Dano & Associates, Robert E. Schiffner, Attorney at Law, Moses Lake, WA, for Respondent.
SCHULTHEIS, J.
Washington courts consider a person "seized" when an officer, by physical force or show of authority, restrains the person's freedom of movement and a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- County of Grant v. Daniel A. VogtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Jamison v. StormDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2006
- County of Grant v. Daniel A. VogtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- State Of Washington v. Steven Lester KezaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020