Legal Opinion
Jewell-Rung Agency, Inc. v. Haddad Organization, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 19, 1993No. 91 Civ. 5645 (RPP)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff Jewell-Rung Agency, Inc. (“Jewell-Rung”), seeks damages in excess of $350,-000 for the defendant’s alleged breach of contract. Defendant The Haddad Organization, Ltd. (“Haddad”), moves for summary judgment on the issue of damages and to strike portions of the affidavits of Donald Jewell and Leo McGinity, submitted by Plaintiff in opposition to summary judgment, on the ground that they do not comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e). Plaintiff cross-moves based on Rule 56(e) for an order striking portions of the affidavit of Neal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sellers v. M.C. Floor Crafters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Kenford Co. v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Medinol Ltd. v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Tronox Inc. v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (In re Tronox Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Coastal Aviation, Inc. v. Commander Aircraft Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Goltz v. University of Notre Dame Du LacDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
- Val Tech Holdings, Inc. v. Wilson Manifolds, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.