Legal Opinion

People v. Allen

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1951No. Crim. 4556PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTLETT, J. pro tem.

The appellants, Dr. James S. Allen and Marie 0 ’Neil, were each charged in an information filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County with the crime of abortion in three counts and, in a fourth count, with the crime of conspiracy which count alleged that the appellants conspired together to violate section 274 of the Penal Code. In regard to this count six overt acts in furtherance of the alleged conspiracy were alleged: (1) that the appellants blindfolded Patsy Kelley; (2) that they blindfolded Anne Ulicsnu; (3) that they blindfolded Lorraine Ashley ; (4) that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. StecconeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. People v. FerlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. GallardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. People v. KendallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. People v. OlfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. KrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API