Legal Opinion
Frazee v. Civil Service Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 13, 1959No. Civ. 18257PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’DONNELL, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal by petitioner from a judgment denying a peremptory writ of mandate to compel his reinstatement as a police officer of the city of Oakland. The appeal is taken on the judgment roll only. Error, if any, therefore must affirmatively appear from the face of the judgment roll before a reversal can be ordered. (Utz v. Aureguy, 109 Cal.App.2d 803 [241 P.2d 639].)
Appellant had, at the time of the incident out of which this proceeding arose, been a police officer of the city of Oakland with full and permanent civil service status for a period of approximately…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Utz v. AureguyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Christal v. Police CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Garvin v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Angelo Dahlia v. Omar RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Coursey v. Board Fire & Police Com'rs of SkokieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- Long Beach City Employees Assn. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Eshelman v. BlubaumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Seattle Police Officers' Guild v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.