Legal Opinion

State v. Valley

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1992No. 90-275PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

After final judgment, defendant, Neal Valley, appeals from a decision of the Fourth Judicial District, Missoula County, denying his motion to suppress physical evidence based on lack of probable cause for issuance of a search warrant. We reverse.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress.

On March 31, 1988, the Missoula County Sheriff’s Department applied to District Court for a warrant to search the residence of defendant, Neal Valley. The application for the search warrant was based on anonymous and confidential tips. The tips as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. NiehausSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  3. State v. SchafferIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. State v. O'NEILLMontana Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. SiegalMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. ReesmanMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. TackittMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. RinehartMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. OrtizNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API