Legal Opinion
State v. Olson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 24, 1989No. C3-88-687PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
Defendant Robert Olson appeals his conviction for first degree murder, three counts of armed robbery, and three counts of second degree assault. He claims, among other things, that his arrest was illegal, lacking probable cause and accomplished by a warrantless entry of the place where he was staying. We conclude Robert Olson’s constitutional rights were violated by the warrantless entry requiring suppression of tainted evidence, and reverse for a new trial.
On Saturday morning, July 18, 1987, shortly before 6 a.m., a lone gunman robbed an Amoco station in Minneapolis,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- James P. Crocker v. Deputy Sheriff Steven Eric BeattyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- State v. KoppiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. HummelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.