Legal Opinion

Scovill Manufacturing Co. v. Skaggs Pay Less Drug Stores

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1955No. S. F. 18830, 19068PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SI1ENK, J.

— This is an appeal by the defendant Skaggs Pay Less Drug Stores from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff Scovill Manufacturing Company in an action based on the Fair Trade Act of 1931 as amended in 1933 and 1941 (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 16900-16905). The plaintiff sought to enjoin the retail sale of its products at prices below those specified by it as the producer. There is also an appeal from a prior order granting a temporary injunction in the same case. This order was merged in the judgment, is not appeal-able and should be dismissed.

The plaintiff has entered into contractual…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Cline v. Frink Dairy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Bourjois Sales Corp. v. DorfmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Allied Properties v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Bulova Watch Co. v. Zale Jewelry Co. of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1962

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API