Legal Opinion
Dodge v. Post
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio
Decided October 23, 1896No. 4,251PublishedCited by 7 opinions
This was a suit in equity by William Dodge and others against Post & Co. and others for infringement of a patent for a separable pulley. Pinal hearing on the merits.
1Opinion of the Court
SAGE, District Judge.
Patent No. 260,462, for separable pulley, on which this suit is based, was granted July 4, 1882, to Dodge & Phillion. Only the first and third claims are alleged to be infringed. They are as follows:
“(1) A separable pulley, whereof, when the meeting ends of the rim are in contact, the meeting faces of the spoke bar and hub are slightly separated, as described, combined with clamp bolts, G, whereby said hub is clamped upon the shaft in the manner set forth.”
“(3) A separable pulley, whereof, when the meeting ends of the rim are in contact, the meeting faces of the spoke bar…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Cantrell v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Mack v. Spencer Optical Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bradley v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1948
- Hagins v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Carson v. American Smelting & Refining Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1923
- Menasha Wood Split Pulley Co. v. DodgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897
- Dodge v. Fulton Pulley Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.