Legal Opinion

Hagins v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 26, 1924No. 2251PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.

A. J. and B. J. Hagins, appellants, filed this suit against W. T. Wilson and Walter Carlisle, to enjoin them from diverting the flood waters of Duck creek, and to recover damages resulting to plaintiffs’ lands by reason of such diversion. A trial before a jury resulted in a verdict for the defendants. Duck creek is not a perennial stream, but during freshets overflows the valley through which it runs, inundating the lands belonging to the several parties to the suit. The territory in controversy is the southeast quarter of section 168 in Dickens county, the southwest quarter of section 167,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Improvement District No. 1 v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hines v. ParryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. Groth v. ThomannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Hook v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Wilson v. HaginsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Wilson v. HaginsTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Wilson v. HaginsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Bunch v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API