Legal Opinion

State v. Ruud

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 6, 1983No. 82-427PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Chittenden Superior Court pursuant to V.R.C.P. 75 which affirmed an order of the Chittenden District Court. The district court found that defendant refused to take a breath test which had been requested on reasonable grounds. By thus violating 23 V.S.A. § 1205, defendant became subject to the civil penalties provided for by the statute. See State v. Mayo, 137 Vt. 77, 398 A.2d 303 (1979). Defendant now renews the argument he urged on the superior court, that the record contains insufficient evidence to support a finding of a knowing refusal to submit to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  2. State v. WelchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  3. State v. RifkinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  4. State v. DurlingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  5. McGarry v. CostelloSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  2. State v. NicholsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. In re Tariff Filing of New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  4. State v. HayesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API