Mann v. Bowen
Supreme Court of Georgia
Actions. Damages. Partnership. Before Judge Roberts. Pulaski superior court. November term, 1889. ■ Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Simmons, Justice.
This was an action by Mann against Bowen for damages for breach of contract. The declaration alleged in substance that on April 10th, 1884, Mann and Bowen *617entered into a parol contract to go into a mercantile business in or about August or September, 1884; Bowen was to put into the firm $3,000.00 or more and furnish the storehouse for the business, and Mann was to put his labor and experience against Bowen’s capital and manage and control the business; Mann was to have one-third of the profits, and was to conduct the business as long as they could make it profitable and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Powell v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Hill v. PalmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Wadsworth v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miller v. WalserNevada Supreme Court · 1919
- Lane v. LodgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Bone v. FairclothCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Latham v. DukeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.