Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Henderson
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 14, 1963No. 22197PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mobley, Justice.
1. An order denying a motion for summary judgment is never subject to review. Code Ann. § 110-1208; Burnam v. Wilkerson, 217 Ga. 657 (1) (124 SE2d 389); Macon Auto Auction v. Ga. Cas. &c. Co., 104 Ga. App. 245 (3) (121 SE2d 400); Southern Guaranty Ins. Co. v. Beasley, 106 Ga. App. 64, 65 (126 SE2d 260); Howkins v. Atlanta Baggage &c. Co., 107 Ga. App. 38, 43 (3) (129 SE2d 158).
2. The allegations of the petition contained in the statement of facts, and particularly the allegations that plaintiff and defendant entered into a partnership agreement to purchase, operate, and hold…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ansley v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Aycock v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Hadaway v. HadawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Floyd v. KicklighterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Burnam v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Concrete Coring Contractors, Inc. v. Mechanical Contractors & Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Varellas v. VarellasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965