Legal Opinion

Welch v. Haley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1951No. 33384PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss the writ of error on the ground that the bill of exceptions fails to designate either a plaintiff in error or a defendant in error. An examination of the record shows that B. C. Welch, an individual, does name himself as plaintiff in error, That Mrs. Haley is the defendant in error, while not stated in these precise words, is obvious from both the heading and body of the bill of exceptions. The rule is that, while the plaintiff in error and the defendant in error should be expressly designated, a failure to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Greenwood v. GreenblattSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  2. Bowen v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Cosby v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Boyce v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Reynolds v. KinseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGinty v. Interstate Land & Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. Murry v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  3. Dodson v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API