Legal Opinion

McGinty v. Interstate Land & Improvement Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 29, 1955No. 35883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

Error is assigned on the following portion of the court’s charge: “Adjoining landowners may agree upon the dividing line between them, and each will own up to the agreed line as fully as if it were a natural boundary or as if their respective deeds or grants called for it. Such agreement may be implied as well as expressed, and in either case the definite settlement of the boundary line not previously defined is a good and sufficient consideration to uphold the agreement. Where an agreement establishing a dividing line between adjoining property owners is followed by acquiescence and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Farr v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Payne v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Hayes v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Zachery v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carter v. WyattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Sceirine v. DensmoreNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API