Legal Opinion

Woodall v. McCurry

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 29, 1936No. 25465PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. The court, did not err in overruling the general and special grounds of the demurrer to the affidavit of illegality.

2. “Where a ease has- been tried by a jury and a verdict rendered therein, and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for a new trial is indispensable.” Beall v. Mineral Tone Co., 167 Ga. 667, 670 (146 S. E. 473), and cit.; Shippen Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Johnson, 168 Ga. 112 (147 S. E. 115); Sheftall v. Johnson, 171 Ga. 890 (157 S. E. 94); Head v. North American Life Ins. Co., 172 Ga. 766 (2) (158 S. E. 746), and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beall v. Mineral Tone Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  2. Sheftall v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  3. Mobley v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  4. Shippen Hardwood Lumber Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  5. Head v. North American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farmers Fertilizer Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Tift v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API