Legal Opinion

Mobley v. Ellis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 17, 1928No. 18079PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. “Where a ease has been tried by a jury and a verdict rendered therein, and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for a new trial is indispensable.” Mackin v. Blalock, 133 Ga. 550 (4) (66 S. E. 265, 134 Am. St. R. 220). “The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a verdict will not be considered by this court upon a direct bill of exceptions. The question must be made and passed upon in the court below, by a motion for new trial.” Bacon v. Jones, 117 Ga. 497 (2) (43 S. E. 689). See also Jones v. Pitts, 98 Ga. 521 (3) (25 S. E.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ocean Steamship Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Gilliard v. Johnston & MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. Mackin v. BlalockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Taylor v. ReeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Hightower v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Georgia Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Hamilton National Bank v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Brown Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  4. Sheftall v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  5. Morris v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API