Legal Opinion

Tift v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1959No. 37775Published

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Presiding Judge.

The defendant sued out a direct bill of exceptions to this court wherein the sole assignment of error was that the defendant excepted to the verdict directed for the plaintiff as being erroneous and contrary to law. Under such record there is no question presented for determination by this court and the writ of error must be dismissed. See Hamilton Nat. Bank v. Robertson, 177 Ga. 734 (171 S. E. 293); Baker v. Decatur Lumber & Supply Co., 211 Ga. 510, 513 (87 S. E. 2d 89); and Woodall v. McCurry, 54 Ga. App. 437 (2) (188 S. E. 270) and citations therein. WHt of error…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hamilton National Bank v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Baker v. Decatur Lumber & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  3. Woodall v. McCurryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API