United States v. Vehicular Parking, Ltd.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
Final judgment was entered in this case, after final argument on the form of the decree. Nearly a year later the Vehicular group of defendants 2 now moves to modify the judgment. The substantial features of suggested modification are: (1) Not to have the decree run against the individual defendants; (2) there should be no provision that defendants be required to give royalty-free licenses; (3) defendants should not be enjoined from threatening to institute or instituting infringement suits; and (4) the elimination of the visitorial paragraphs under which the Department…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- B. B. Chemical Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Mercoid Corp. v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Park-In Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
- Magee-Hale Park-O-Meter Co. v. Vehicular Parking, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Chandler v. STERN DENTAL LABORATORY COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1971
- Duncan Meter Corp. v. M. H. Rhodes, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1946