Legal Opinion

Canal Construction Co. v. Schlickum

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1905No. Calendar No. 20,840Published

Certiorari to Saginaw; Beach, J. Mandamus by the Canal Construction Company to compel Charles Schlickum, supervisor of Blumfield township, to spread a certain tax. To review an order granting the writ, respondent brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

This is certiorari for the purpose of reviewing the action of the circuit judge of Saginaw county in granting relator a writ of mandamus directing the respondent, as supervisor of the township of Blumfield, to spread upon the assessment roll of said township drain taxes for the construction of Cheboygan creek drain in the sum of $8,500.48.

The record shows that prior to July 20, 1903, the drain commissioners of Saginaw and Bay counties had established a drain known as “Cheboygan Creek Drain,” located in the townships of Blumfield and Buena Vista, in Saginaw county, and the township of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of State Tax Commissioners v. QuinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Laubach v. O'MearaMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Scholtz v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Friedman v. HorningMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Brown v. NehmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API