Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Horning

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari to Saginaw; Beach, J. Mandamus by Kalma Friedman to compel Washburn Horning, county treasurer, to pay a certain order. From an order granting the writ, respondent brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This hearing is brought on a writ of certiorari issued out of this court to review the action of Emmet L. Beach, a circuit judge of Saginaw county, in issuing a mandamus compelling the petitioner here, Washburn Horning, county treasurer of Saginaw county, to pay Kalma Friedman, the relator in the circuit court, the sum of $33.24 for services and mileage while acting as a member of the board of supervisors at the June session of said board. Mr. Friedman was duly appointed a member of the board of assessment and review of the city of Saginaw in 1899, and by virtue of that office was a member of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Supervisors v. Supervisor of MentorMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Van Akin v. DunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Board of Education v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wiles v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. Hulbert v. CraigNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Canal Construction Co. v. SchlickumMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API