Board of State Tax Commissioners v. Quinn
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus by the board of State tax commissioners to compel John H. Quinn, assessor of the city of Ishpeming, to spread the taxes upon his roll according to the increased valuations fixed by said board.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The board of State tax commissioners applies for a mandamus to compel the respondent, who is *129the assessor of the city of Ishpeming, to levy all of the taxes upon his assessment roll, including local, county, and school, as well as State, taxes, according to the increased valuations placed upon property upon said roll, and not according to the valuations of the local board of review, which its petition alleges that he refuses to do. The petition states that it was made to appear to the board that certain property in the city of Ishpeming had been omitted from the assessment roll of the city,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Board of State Tax Commissioners v. Board of AssessorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Laubach v. O'MearaMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Scholtz v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- City of Jackson v. Jackson County TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Union School-District v. ParrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by11 opinions
- Briggs Tax Service, LLC v. Detroit Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Hudson Motor Car Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- School District No. 9, Pittsfield Township v. Washtenaw County Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Attorney General ex rel. Barnes v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Lusk v. Porter, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.