Legal Opinion

State v. Durham

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 2012No. ED 95133PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KURT S. ODENWALD, Chief Judge.

On the Court’s own motion, the opinion filed in this case on March 13, 2012, is hereby withdrawn and a new opinion is to issue. Appellant’s motion for rehearing and/or transfer to the Missouri Supreme Court is denied as moot.

Introduction

Kevin Durham (Durham) appeals from the trial court’s judgment after he was convicted by a jury of two counts of harassment under Section 565.090.1 On direct appeal, Durham asserts multiple claims of error. Durham raises several points on appeal, suggesting first that the State’s original information was fatally flawed, and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. ForrestSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  2. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. State v. BaumrukSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. State v. SumowskiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  5. Mitchell v. KardeschSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. BarkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. FeldtMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State of Missouri v. David BennishMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State of Missouri v. Umar MuhammadMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API