Legal Opinion

Jones v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 2012No. ED 98065PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge.

Introduction

Appellant Alfred Jones (“Jones”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. After a jury trial, Jones was found guilty of one count of forcible rape, in violation of Section 566.030,2 two counts of forcible sodomy, in violation of Section 566.060, one count of kidnapping, in violation of Section 565.110, and two counts of attempted forcible sodomy, in violation of Section 566.060, and the trial court entered judgment accordingly. We affirmed the trial court’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  4. Morrow v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. State v. DeckSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Garvester Bracken, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. RedcapCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. State v. TateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Barton v. JenningsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API